CONTRIBUTORS
Jeffrey Schulze, CFA
Head of Economic and Market Strategy
Josh Jamner, CFA
Investment Strategy Analyst
Key takeaways
- Equity markets experienced one of the most severe rotations in years in July, with small cap and value stocks surging and mega cap tech stocks selling off.
- A key question for investors is whether this move continues or fades out similar to previous rotations. Several of the five primary catalysts that sparked the recent leadership shift may persist over the coming quarters.
- While a growth scare could spark a retracement of this rotation, we ultimately expect a pickup in economic growth which should favor small cap, value and cyclicals. In our view, the potential for frenetic trading highlights the importance of maintaining a diversified portfolio. We believe active managers have an advantage over passive benchmarks, given their ability to sidestep areas of potential overvaluation.
Softer inflation reading sparks meaningful leadership shift
Equity markets experienced one of the most severe rotations in years in July, with previous laggards like small cap and value stocks becoming leaders and previous leaders like mega cap tech stocks becoming laggards. The S&P 500 Index ended 1.2% higher on the month, a statistic which belies the turmoil that occurred beneath the surface. While the first part of the month saw a continuation of the leadership that dominated markets in the first half of 2024, the CPI release on the morning of July 11 marked a turning point. Since their peak the day prior, the Magnificent Seven stocks (Alphabet, Amazon.com, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla) are down 9.4% while the Russell 2000 is up 9.9%.1 Further, the S&P 500 equal-weight index outpaced the cap-weighted version by 5.6% and the Russell 1000 Value Index outpaced the Russell 1000 Growth Index by just over 10%.
Exhibit 1: 2024 Equity Market Leadership
Data as of July 31, 2024. Sources: S&P, Russell, UBS, and Bloomberg. Note: Magnificent 7 vs. 493 is the UBS Magnificent 7 relative price return vs. UBS S&P ex Magnificent 7; Cap vs. Equal is the S&P 500 relative price return vs. S&P 500 Equal Weight; Large vs. Small is the Russell 1000 relative price return vs. Russell 2000; Growth vs. Value is the Russell 1000 Growth relative price return vs. Russell 1000 Value.
This shift has taken many investors by surprise and, while we view the broadening of market leadership as a healthy dynamic, the key question looking forward is whether this move will persist or fade out in a manner similar to several previous rotations in the last few years. We believe it is informative to analyze the five primary catalysts that sparked the rotation and to then formulate a view regarding which dynamics may have already fully played out and which may have greater durability in the coming months.
- Cooling Inflation: The leadership rotation began in force following the release of the June CPI data. A third consecutive softer print helped confirm that the elevated inflation readings from the first quarter were more of an aberration, clearing the way for the Federal Reserve to begin normalizing interest rates at its September meeting. This should help reaccelerate US economic growth in 2025 and fully cement the already-unfolding soft landing, which should drive superior earnings growth for more cyclical businesses that perform better when GDP is picking up. Small cap and value benchmarks typically have greater exposure to cyclical companies relative to large cap and growth, and are thus positioned to continue to benefit as interest rate policy normalizes later in 2024 and into 2025.
- Positioning: Prior to the June CPI data, 2024 had largely been marked by a continuation of the past several years in which the Magnificent Seven dominated equity markets. This multiyear dynamic has drawn strong flows into these names, resulting in skewed positioning, with most investors crowded over to one side of the metaphorical boat. While investors have started to spread out across the rest of the boat, this extreme positioning has not yet been fully unwound. However, the initial round of associated short covering is likely closer to its end, meaning this dynamic is less likely to be a primary driver over the intermediate term.
- Market Concentration and Valuation: The 10 largest S&P 500 Index constituents accounted for 37.5% of the benchmark coming into the third quarter. This is well ahead of what was seen in the late 1990s and lends to elevated concentration risk. Further, this dynamic has skewed valuations because the 10 largest names traded at 29.3x expected next 12-month earnings while the other 490 were at a much more reasonable 17.8x. Stretched valuations mean less downside protection when the perception of negative news takes hold, and while this valuation gap has narrowed in July, there is further room for both valuation gaps (between the largest names and the rest of the market) to normalize and index concentration to unwind over the next
few years.
Exhibit 2: Largest Stocks Distorting Valuations
NTM = Next 12 Months. Data as of June 30, 2024. Source: UBS.
- An Artificial intelligence (AI) Bubble? The early read from second-quarter earnings season was somewhat disappointing, with softer numbers and disappointing guidance from some AI-exposed names in particular amplifying the budding leadership rotation. However, with earnings season now past the halfway mark, more recent reports have delivered better numbers and more optimistic guidance. While investors may keep questioning if AI mania has been taken too far, profit taking on weakness following a tremendous rally may continue. However, we believe many of these fears are overblown, a view rooted in conversations with our sector research colleagues such as ClearBridge Technology Hardware Analyst Anuj Parikh, who notes solid underlying fundamentals in the space:
“Rapid advances in generative AI and the development of more capable models is contributing to strong adoption of AI infrastructure and services by millions of developers and leading companies across industries as AI enables them to develop better-quality software, find insights from their data and protect their organizations from cybersecurity threats.”
Given this, we do not believe that AI bubble fears currently represent a long-term driver of a leadership rotation.
- Relative Earnings Growth: Recent market leadership has been largely supported by fundamentals, with the largest S&P 500 names delivering strong earnings per share (EPS) growth while the rest of the benchmark and small cap stocks experienced an earnings recession. However, the second quarter is expected to be the last quarter where the Magnificent Seven have a meaningful EPS growth advantage, and they are, in fact, expected to lag going forward. This change in relative fundamentals is beginning to be discounted in earnings multiples, with earnings the primary driver of market returns over longer periods of time. Accordingly, this swing in relative earnings growth—should it play out—could drive a more durable market leadership rotation over the next 12–18 months.
Exhibit 3: Magnificent 7 Advantage Dissipating
Magnificent 7 refers to the following set of stocks: Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), Apple (AAPL), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA). Data as of July 31, 2024. Sources: FactSet, Russell, S&P.
Putting this all together, several of the primary drivers behind the recent market leadership rotation have the potential to persist over the coming quarters. Leadership rarely moves in a straight line, and we believe the near term (the next several months) could see an oscillation that favors the previous leadership on the perception of safety if the economy cools further. Ultimately, we believe a soft landing will play out, a view rooted in the signals emanating from the ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard, which had no changes this month and remains in green (expansionary) territory.
Exhibit 4: ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard
Source: ClearBridge Investments.
While a growth scare may nip this building leadership rotation in the bud, we believe the economy will ultimately reaccelerate. Our confidence is based on a solid macro foundation, few excesses in the market and a more accommodative Fed. We believe this pickup in economic growth should favor the recent winners, namely small cap, value and cyclical stocks more exposed to an accelerating economy. Potentially frenetic market leadership is a good reminder of the importance of portfolio diversification and periodic rebalancing, particularly following long stretches of out- (or under-) performance. Finally, the events of the past few weeks also serve to highlight the advantage that active managers possess when market concentration reaches extremes, as passive funds are unable to sidestep areas of potential concern in the benchmarks they track.
Endnote:
- As of July 11, 2024.
Definitions
The ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard is a group of 12 indicators that examine the health of the US economy and the likelihood of a downturn.
S&P 493 is known as the S&P 500 Index excluding the seven technology stocks (Magnificent Seven). The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks that is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the United States.
The Russell 1000 Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of domestic large-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded US companies in the Russell 3000 Index.
The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the large-cap Russell 1000 Index chosen for their value orientation.
The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the large-cap Russell 1000 Index chosen for their growth orientation.
The Russell 2000 Index is an index of domestic small-cap stocks that measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded US companies in the Russell 3000 Index.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average change in US consumer prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services determined by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal.
Active management does not ensure gains or protect against market declines.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss.
Small- and mid-cap stocks involve greater risks and volatility than large-cap stocks.
Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio. Past performance does not guarantee future results.