Skip to content

Key takeaways

  • Geopolitical shocks have not stopped emerging market equities from delivering strong returns, challenging dated views that they should be avoided whenever global risks increase.
  • Today’s emerging markets look very different from the old risk playbook, with more diverse economies, global champions, stronger domestic growth drivers and a backdrop that looks increasingly supportive.
  • For investors, the bigger risk may lie not in owning emerging markets in an uncertain world, but in waiting for certainty and an entry point that never comes.

War in Ukraine. Expanding conflict in the Middle East. Trade wars. Political uncertainty across multiple continents. By the old rulebook, emerging markets should have struggled in this environment: the first to sell off when headlines darkened, and the last to recover when risk appetite returned.

However, recent evidence has proved otherwise. Despite a near-constant stream of geopolitical turbulence over the past few years, many emerging market equities have delivered strong returns, including a rebound of over 30% for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index in 2025 alone and robust performance year-to-date in 2026—even factoring in the July selloff. So why does the old “Emerging markets are too risky right now” instinct keep showing up, and is it still pointing at the right risks?

How Global Risks Shaped Views on Emerging Markets

This instinct is understandable and comes from real experience. For decades, emerging markets were tightly tied to oil and commodity prices, and when oil spiked or crashed emerging market currencies and stocks often moved in lockstep. On top of that, whenever global investors became nervous about a war, a Fed decision or a banking scare, money tended to flee emerging markets first and fastest. A crisis on the other side of the world could hit emerging market investments hard, even when the connection made little logical sense. That pattern may have trained a generation of investors to treat geopolitical headlines as a warning light for emerging markets. For a long time, it was a reasonable signal to watch. However, that link is not as straightforward today.

Geopolitics May Matter Less Than It Used To

Today’s geopolitical shocks are less likely to be purely emerging market events. Trade disputes, wars, energy shocks and supply-chain disruption now ripple through developed and emerging markets alike.

It is also worth separating the headline from the underlying weakness. Many past emerging market selloffs were made worse by unpredictable local politics, weak currencies, heavy external debt or fragile banking systems. Today, we find that the gap between emerging and developed markets and economies is smaller, with many developed markets facing political uncertainty and high debt levels while several emerging markets sport more prudent macro foundations. Additionally, while geopolitical shocks can still create short-term volatility, they do not necessarily turn into deeper emerging market crises; with these markets no longer moving as one broad risk trade, a political shock that may be material for one country, sector or currency may have little direct relevance on another.

Emerging Markets Have Changed

Many emerging market economies are now more diversified, less dependent on commodity exports and supported by deeper domestic capital markets than they were a generation ago. This makes them less vulnerable to the old pattern of foreign investors pulling money at the first sign of trouble.

India’s growth story, for example, is increasingly powered by domestic consumption and infrastructure investment, rather than global trade. Across the wider emerging market universe, the growth of services, manufacturing and domestically driven sectors has also made the asset class broader and more resilient.

At the same time, emerging markets are becoming home to more leading global companies. Taiwan and South Korea provide meaningful exposure to advanced manufacturing and semiconductors, in our opinion, linking parts of the emerging market universe to global AI and broader technology demand rather than old-style commodity cycles (Exhibit 1). We believe this makes emerging markets harder to dismiss as one simple risk trade.

Exhibit 1: Emerging Markets and the AI Trade

Data as of June 30, 2026. Sources: FactSet, MSCI.

The Starting Point Looks Attractive

Even setting aside the decreasing geopolitical risk, we believe the investment backdrop for emerging markets looks attractive on its own terms. Emerging market stocks are currently priced at notably lower multiples compared to their global and US counterparts, trading at discounts of 45% and almost 50%, respectively,1 leaving more room for upside if general sentiment improves (Exhibit 2). Furthermore, if the US dollar continues to soften, the backdrop could become more accommodative to emerging market asset flows, further supporting prices.

Exhibit 2: Emerging Markets Valuations Historically Attractive

Data as of June 30, 2026. Sources: FactSet, MSCI.

Waiting For Certainty May Mean Missing Out

Geopolitical uncertainty is not a temporary condition to be waited out—it is the baseline. There has rarely been a multi-year period in modern market history free of war, trade disputes, election upheaval or diplomatic crisis somewhere in the world. Many emerging market countries are in a better position, both politically and economically, than they have been historically. Treating geopolitical calm as a precondition for emerging market investment does not remove risk; it may simply mean missing the opportunity. For investors, the bigger risk may not be owning emerging markets in an uncertain world but in waiting for a certainty and an entry point that never comes.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be considered individualized investment advice, a recommendation or a solicitation to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability for losses arising from use of this material.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager as of the publication date and may change without notice. These opinions and analyses are based on certain assumptions, including market conditions that may change. They may differ from those of other portfolio managers or from the firm as a whole.

This material is not intended to provide a complete analysis of all material facts regarding any country, region or market. No assurance can be given that any forecast, projection or prediction regarding economies or financial markets will be realized. References to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as recommendations or a solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Any research or analysis in this material has been prepared by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and is provided incidentally. While the information included is believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed, and it is subject to change without notice.

Past performance does not guarantee future results, or any profit or gain. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Franklin Templeton offers environmental, social and governance (ESG) capabilities, though not all strategies or products incorporate ESG as part of the investment process.

Investment strategies and services may not be available in all jurisdictions. Please consult your financial professional or Franklin Templeton contact for further information.

Brazil: Issued by Franklin Templeton Brasil Ltda. Canada: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. Franklin Templeton and Franklin Templeton Canada are business names used by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. Offshore Americas: In the United States, this publication is made available by Franklin Templeton. United States: Issued by Franklin Templeton. Investments are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed.

Europe: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., 8A, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg. Poland: Issued by Templeton Asset Management (Poland) TFI S.A.; Rondo ONZ 1; 00-124 Warsaw. Saudi Arabia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Financial Company, KAFD, Building 3.09, Office No. 8018, Level 8, Saudi Arabia. Regulated by CMA. License no. 23265-22. South Africa: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments SA (PTY) Limited, which is authorised by the FSCA as a Financial Service Provider (No.44475). Switzerland: Issued by Franklin Templeton Switzerland Ltd, Talstrasse 41, CH-8001 Zurich. Middle East & Africa (ex South Africa): Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (ME) Limited, which is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Address: Franklin Templeton, The Gate, East Wing, Level 2, Dubai International Financial Centre, P.O. Box 506613, Dubai, U.A.E. Tel: +971(04) 428 4100. United Kingdom: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML), registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL.

Australia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Australia Limited (ABN 76 004 835 849) (Australian Financial Services License Holder No. 240827), Level 47, 120 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000. Hong Kong: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited. Japan: Issued by Franklin Templeton Japan Co., Ltd. South Korea: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Advisors Korea Co., Ltd. Malaysia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Asset Management (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & Franklin Templeton GSC Asset Management Sdn. Bhd. Singapore: Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. (UEN) 199205211E.

Access your local website at https://www.franklintempleton.com/corporate/all-sites.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Copyright © 2026 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.